The results of the research were put in the context of sustainable development. The aim of the article was to determine the relationship between the occurrence of social pathologies (alcoholism, drug addiction, violence and aggression, poor financial standing, poverty, unemployment and crime) and the sense of security in local communities. The article ends with a consideration of the advantages of this view compared to existing approaches to populism. This all makes populism a self-defeating political ideology and bad candidate for advancing democracy in times of crisis. When enacted in political practices and institutions, this ideal creates the conditions for undermining different forms of political freedom, including populist’s own ideal of collective self-expression, which they erode by fostering expressive domination. This disconnect is due to populists’ ideal of freedom, which they understand as authentic self-expression of ‘the People’, rejecting the need for mediating instances such as parties, parliaments or epistemic actors. As such, it suffers from a disconnect between first order political practices and the reflexive grasp of the meaning of those practices. This article argues that populism, both in its left-wing and right-wing versions, is a social pathology in the sense contemporary critical theorists give to it. On the other hand, the NGO's organization with the formation of adolescent police and more attention to the status of this group, in order to prevent the tendency of adolescents and young people to Narcotics take the necessary measures.
To reduce the tendency of adolescents and young people to use narcotics, various social institutions (family, school, community) are recommended by creating healthy recreation, changing existing programs in the media, eliminating the restrictions of the internal reference groups, promoting The level of education of families, the attention of parents to children and care in the peer group's membership in the prevention of serious attention. Economic factors, mass media, reference groups, and social institutions have an impact on the tendency of adolescents and young people to use drugs. In this research, factors and variables such as family, peers, satellite, internet, artists, athletes and monthly (adolescent) receipts from the family as factors influencing the tendency of adolescents and young people to use drugs are determined. The four conceptions are compared along six criteria: (1) is the view plausible? (2) is it informative (if true)? (3) does it help define the task of social philosophy? (4) does it take naturalistic vocabulary seriously? (5) does it hold that pathologies share a structure? and (6) how does it see the primacy of being wrong and being pathological? The fourth view operates with the notion of a social life that can degenerate. The third view takes it that society is the kind of substance that can fall ill – an organism. The last two conceptions are ‘naturalist’ and hold that something is wrong because it is pathological. On the second view, social pathologies share a structure (e.g. On the first view, there is no encompassing characterization of social pathologies available: it is a cluster concept of family resemblances. The first two conceptions are ‘normativist’ and hold that something is a social pathology if it is socially wrong.
It discusses four conceptions of social pathology. This article starts with the idea that the task of social philosophy can be defined as the diagnosis and therapy of social pathologies.
0 kommentar(er)
